Blog

A client pins “change this heading” on a Bricks page. Instead of copying the comment into an AI chat and explaining where it belongs, connect Reviso through MCP so your assistant can read the feedback and inspect the target. This guide shows a controlled workflow for making one change and checking it before closing the…

Client feedback tools generally cost between $7 and $42 per user per month on per-seat SaaS plans, or a free tier, annual licence or one-off purchase for a self-hosted WordPress plugin. Compare the billing model as well as the headline price. Per-seat plans depend on paid user counts; flat and self-hosted plans may instead limit…

A content approval workflow is the agreed path a piece of content takes from draft to approved: who proposes changes, who reviews them, who signs off, and where the record of that approval lives. Most teams have one by accident - a chain of emails, a Google Doc with comments, and a "looks good!" that…

If you collect client feedback on web projects, three tools come up again and again: BugHerd, Marker.io and Atarim. Here is how they differ, and where a WordPress-native option fits. Quick comparison ToolBest forPricing modelWhere it runs BugHerdVisual feedback + bug tracking on a Kanban boardPer-seat SaaSAny site, external app Marker.ioBug reports into Jira /…

Most web projects do not stall because the design is wrong. They stall in the review stage, where feedback arrives scattered across email and Slack, nobody can tell which note maps to which page, and "approval" is a moving target that never quite arrives. A tighter loop: pin, resolve, approve A faster review workflow has…

WordPress 7.1 Notes help logged-in collaborators review content in the block editor. Client review tools serve a different need: collecting feedback on the rendered website and recording approval. The right choice depends on who is reviewing and what they need to check. WordPress 7.1 was released on 19 August 2026. This comparison now reflects the…

Why client feedback on Divi gets messy You build the Divi site, send the client a link, and the feedback comes back as a wall of emails, screenshots with arrows, and vague notes like "make the header bigger." Nobody can tell which comment maps to which page or element, and the review drags on for…

Every web designer knows this comment: "Can we change the wording here?" - followed by three emails working out what the wording should actually be. Reviso 1.5 removes that loop. With Suggest mode, your client proposes the new wording directly on the live page, exactly where it sits, like a tracked change in a document.…

The usual client-feedback flow on a WordPress build is a mess: you export the staging site to a PDF, or ask the client to make an account on some tool, and feedback comes back as blurry screenshots and vague notes. On a Bricks or Elementor site, where everything is built visually, that disconnect is especially…

Client feedback is easier to act on when your AI assistant can see the comment, the page and the element it refers to. Reviso connects that context to a compatible assistant through MCP, so you can ask Claude or ChatGPT to work from pinned website feedback instead of copying comments between tools. For supported Bricks…

Reviso's client review and approval screens are now available in German, French and Spanish, so your clients review and sign off in their own language.

The block editor makes building pages in WordPress quick. Collecting clean feedback on those pages is another matter. It usually arrives as a pile of emails, blurry screenshots and vague notes, and you spend longer decoding it than fixing it. There is a simpler way: let the client comment directly on the live page, on…